By Daniel Terdiman
Published: Friday 16 December 2005
Email story to a Friend | Report Abuse
Name
Michael Roy Everatt
Location
Toronto Canada
Occupation
Business Owner/Knowledge Hobbyist
Comment
> Readers, Wikipedia and Britannica.
While peer review levels the playing field some, it does not address the evolving nature of our knowledge base and the resulting inaccuracy. Which company does a better job staying on top of emerging and/or developing issues/items? When Christopher Columbus made his historic voyage, a peer review would surely have considered that the world was flat. It has been my experience that Wikipedia is considerably better in this critical area.
> Readers, Wikipedia and Britannica.
While peer...
Michael Roy Everatt
The articles were sent off to field experts for re...
Anonymous
Life imitating art? This competition between Wikip...
Ian Sargent
Spell Check is making everybody stupid.
I contin...
Russell2130
Agenda Setters 2009
Welcome to the ninth annual Agenda Setters poll – silicon.com's list of the top 50 most influential individuals in the technology and IT industries, from techies and CIOs to entrepreneurs and business leaders. Find out more in our latest special report.
Copyright © 2008 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved. Top of page
RSS Feeds
The Round-Up The Weekly Round-Up: 03.12.09 'Ere guv, you'll never guess who I had in the back of my cab the other day…'
Stuart Roberts Shared services - how to get it right in your business Recession boosts uptake