
One rule for the record companies, another for music fans?
By silicon.com
Published: 7 October 2004 17:35 GMT
File-sharing is illegal. Musicians know that, record labels know that and file-sharers are more than well aware of that. So the news today that industry body The British Phonographic Industry (BPI) is suing 28 file-sharers comes as no surprise.
While the rights and wrongs are pretty clear-cut in the law's eyes – it's illegal; if you do it, you're likely to get into trouble – the BPI's policy seems a little confused.
Unlike its US equivalent, the RIAA, the BPI has gone for suing uploaders rather than downloaders to "cut the problem off at its source". It leaves a huge swathe of downloaders operating in safety and the thought of 28 out of the whole uploading community being sued isn't exactly going to give many people sleepless nights.
At least the RIAA tried to hit big – most recently, they filed suits against more than 700 file-sharers in one go.
Illegal music uploading is dropping and not in small measures either – according to a BPI spokesman, by hundreds of millions. Is the campaign to get litigious getting results? Possibly. But it's certainly no coincidence that the as the amount of legal downloads has boomed, the number of illegal downloads has fallen significantly.
The BPI, like others before it, makes a decent case for legal action – along the lines of 'if we don't keep the record labels ticking over now, there's no incentive to for them to keep putting money into new bands.'
But when those same record labels are reportedly creaming off a huge proportion of the profits from legal online music and leaving song-shops with a paltry four per cent, it does look a little like shooting yourself in the foot and a lot like 'one rule for us, one rule for them'.
For music fans, legal downloading is a real boon – most don't fancy being on the wrong side of the law and with tracks at 29p and upwards, pocket-money prices are helping to knock the financial incentive that encourages piracy on the head.
But while the mainstream is amply catered for, a lot of smaller record labels and more niche styles are still by and large neglected in the digital realm, giving some downloaders what they see as little alternative but to turn to the song-swappers.
Perhaps the BPI would have better spent its lawyers' fees on nurturing the legal market instead of cracking down on the illegal one.
Opportunity to use your File-net skills to work for a global ITO firm. Excellent opportunities to Director level 50,000 - 80,000 + Bonus I am looking ...
Creating, uploading and managing content cross our Festival portfolio. Collate and distribute event URLs to optimise linkbuilding with internal and ...
License music rights from record labels and publishers for use in communications. Facilitate payment of appropriate talent and music sessions and ...
Agenda Setters 2009
Welcome to the ninth annual Agenda Setters poll – silicon.com's list of the top 50 most influential individuals in the technology and IT industries, from techies and CIOs to entrepreneurs and business leaders. Find out more in our latest special report.
Stories from the web...
Copyright © 2008 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved. Top of page
Peter Cochrane Peter Cochrane's Blog: How the telcos could save themselves Doomed network operators could thrive with a bit of innovation
Peter Cochrane Peter Cochrane's Blog: Facebook saves teen from prison Another unexpected impact of social networking