iPhone 2.0 cuts business mustard, says Gartner

Moreover, as it stands, the device "does not deliver sufficient security for custom applications". So businesses wanting to deploy custom apps can either "accept the lowered overall security footprint that adoption will dictate or block the device from use", said Gartner.

The report also considers the implications of running iTunes in an enterprise setting - as it must be running on the desktop of every iPhone user - a situation that is not ideal for businesses.

Apple uses iTunes to automatically send out firmware updates to end users, "which could be an issue if the IT organisation hasn't verified what Apple has delivered", the analyst warns.

iPhone take two: All the coverage

♦ Editor's Blog: Why we write about the iPhone

♦ iPhone 3G sales hit one million mark

♦ 10 things we'd change on the 3G iPhone

♦ 3G iPhone launch: Tech trouble for O2

♦  iPhone 3G: The wait is over

♦ ¿Dónde está el iPhone 3G?

♦  Photos: Steve Jobs dances the iPhone 3G tune

♦  Unveiled: The 3G iPhone

♦ iPhone 2.0 - ready for business?

♦ iPhone 2.0 - the rumours and the reality

It adds: "We strongly suggest that enterprises use existing management tools to modify the iTunes registry entries to disable firmware updates, file transfers and other activities that could inject unwanted content into the enterprise, as well as to lock down the registry."

In the longer term, Gartner is keen to see Apple offer the option to "eliminate iTunes (as a desktop application) as a necessary component to access business applications and manage the device, as Microsoft and RIM have done".

Other iPhone "inconveniences" enterprises should be aware of include its limited battery life, which on default settings - and only using the device for email and some limited browsing (not for any phone calls) - "seldom" yielded a full day of use for Gartner's testers.

The report adds: "Although we cannot confirm what is causing the battery life to be so short, we believe it to be Apple's implementation of Exchange ActiveSync and/or wi-fi."

Testers also reported issues with attachment handling - as files must be downloaded before they are read, which it warns "may take time". This stands in contrast to the BlackBerry, which gives users the choice of a "quick rendering from the server". Moreover, Apple does not support attachment editing.

The ongoing lack of cut and paste is also troublesome for business users and the analyst also claims to have stumbled on some glitches with Outlook calendar and email integration. The lack of options to create sophisticated user profiles, such as 'meeting', 'car' etc, are another gripe.

But it's not all bad - the browser is lauded as "excellent" and the app store is also flagged up by the analyst.

The report concludes: "Apple has delivered an iPhone that is acceptable for business use at the appliance level. Most prospective iPhone users will judge the device based on consumer appeal. The AppStore applications and the iPhone's excellent browser are supplemented with an email client, which provides acceptable business capability with excellence in some areas."

It adds: "Those who previously used a BlackBerry, Windows Mobile or Nokia smart phone device should note that the iPhone will require an assessment of trade-offs in hardware design and onboard functionality. However, each enterprise will view iPhone through its own lens, which will be heavily tinted by the organisation's security and management needs. Enterprises should approach expanded use of the iPhone slowly and with close examination."