You are here: silicon.com > Networks > Broadband & ISPs

Broadband & ISPs

Big Brother is alive and well and living in Brussels

EU surveillance plans irk privacy lobby

By CNET Networks

Published: 20 August 2002 14:40 GMT

By Graeme Wearden

ISPs and telcos could soon be forced to store communications traffic data for up to two years and make that information available to governments throughout Europe if new legislation being considered by the European Union is ratified.

Statewatch, a UK internet-based organisation that monitors threats to civil liberties, said on Monday that European governments are planning to force all of Europe's telephone and mobile network operators and internet service providers (ISPs) to store details of their customers' communications traffic data for up to two years.

This data, which would include records of web use, emails and phone calls, would be made available to governments and law enforcement agencies.

The European Parliament is currently debating changes to the 1997 EU Directive on privacy in telecommunications, which governs existing laws on communications data retention. This directive states that traffic data can only be retained for billing purposes, and must then be deleted.

European governments are expected to agree to changes to the 1997 directive that would allow individual countries to bring in laws forcing communications firms to retain data.

Statewatch, though, says it has seen a copy of a binding "Framework Decision" that is currently being worked on by some EU governments. The framework decision, which could be voted into law next month, would force all governments to bring in laws that would compel communications firms to retain all traffic data for between 12 and 24 months.

It has been rumoured for some time that EU governments were secretly working on such changes.

Tony Bunyan, editor of Statewatch, said in a statement: "EU governments claimed that changes to the 1997 EC Directive on privacy in telecommunications to allow for data retention and access by the law enforcement agencies would not be binding on Member States - each national parliament would have to decide. Now we know that all along they were intending to make it binding, 'compulsory', across Europe."

Bunyan added that the draft Framework Decision would sweep away the basic rights of data protection, the proper rules of procedure, scrutiny by supervisory bodies and judicial review.

It is thought that the Framework Decision includes the proviso that the police would need to obtain a judicial order before gaining access to traffic data, but Statewatch warns that such conditions have been side-stepped before.

Graeme Wearden writes for ZDNet UK

  1. Zones
  2. Management
  3. Networks
  4. Software
  5. IT Services
  6. Hardware
  1. Verticals
  2. Public Sector
  3. Financial Services
  4. Retail & Leisure

  • Jobs
Senior Account Manager-Public Sector-IT Services

You will purely target the Public Sector as this area is continuing to spend in the current climate, areas of particular interest include Health, NHS ...

Support Engineer

Some 70% of UK Local Government organisations use NDL solutions, as do Central Government department's inlcuding health, military and law enforcement ...

TMT Strategic Development Manager

The Company You will be working for a company focused on facilitating consultations with industry experts in this case with the telecommunications, ...

Agenda Setters 2009
Welcome to the ninth annual Agenda Setters poll – silicon.com's list of the top 50 most influential individuals in the technology and IT industries, from techies and CIOs to entrepreneurs and business leaders. Find out more in our latest special report.





Quick Sitemap Links: